From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardson v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 12, 2019
Case No. LACV 18-5730-FMO (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. LACV 18-5730-FMO (LAL)

11-12-2019

RANDALE HARDSON, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Objections and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

Petitioner's Objections lack merit for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and
/// /// ///
3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.
DATED: November 12, 2019

/s/_________

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hardson v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 12, 2019
Case No. LACV 18-5730-FMO (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2019)
Case details for

Hardson v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:RANDALE HARDSON, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 12, 2019

Citations

Case No. LACV 18-5730-FMO (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2019)