From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardney v. Lamarque

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 2, 2007
No. 2:04-CV-0476-RRB-KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2007)

Opinion

No. 2:04-CV-0476-RRB-KJM P.

October 2, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff John Hardney ("Plaintiff"), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 2, 2007, Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller filed Findings Recommendations (Docket 28) herein, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the same were to be filed within twenty days. The time period has now expired and neither party has filed objections to the Findings Recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the Findings Recommendations at Docket 28 to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings Recommendations at Docket 28, filed on August 2, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss at Docket 25 is DENIED.


Summaries of

Hardney v. Lamarque

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 2, 2007
No. 2:04-CV-0476-RRB-KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2007)
Case details for

Hardney v. Lamarque

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HARDNEY, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY LAMARQUE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 2, 2007

Citations

No. 2:04-CV-0476-RRB-KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 2, 2007)

Citing Cases

Morales v. Pelican Bay State Prison

As noted above, this case was closed when summary judgment was granted to defendants. Yet, a grant of summary…

Foster v. Statti

Defendants also cite to 06-cv-0792, where summary judgment was granted for defendants. Yet, a grant of…