From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardney v. G. Phillips

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 4, 2015
2:13-cv-2371 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2015)

Opinion


JOHN HARDNEY, Plaintiff, v. G. PHILLIPS, et al., Defendants. No. 2:13-cv-2371 TLN CKD P United States District Court, E.D. California. March 4, 2015

          ORDER

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

         On January 12, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

         The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

         ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed on January 12, 2015, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants' motion to dismiss misjoined defendant (ECF No. 34) is granted; and

3. Defendant Mazyck is dismissed from this action. This dismissal does not preclude Plaintiff from filing a separate action against Defendant Mazyck.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hardney v. G. Phillips

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 4, 2015
2:13-cv-2371 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2015)
Case details for

Hardney v. G. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HARDNEY, Plaintiff, v. G. PHILLIPS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 4, 2015

Citations

2:13-cv-2371 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 4, 2015)