From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardney v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 29, 2006
No. CIV S 06-0300 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S 06-0300 LKK EFB P.

August 29, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner seeking a writ of habeas corpus.See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On June 16, 2006, the court gave respondents 45 days to file and serve a response to the petition.

The 45 days have passed and respondents have not filed and served a response.

Accordingly, respondents have 30 days from the date this order is served to explain in writing why they failed to comply with the June 16, 2006, order. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order on Stanley Cross, Senior Assistant Attorney General.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Hardney v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 29, 2006
No. CIV S 06-0300 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2006)
Case details for

Hardney v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HARDNEY, Petitioner, v. TOM CAREY, Warden, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 29, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S 06-0300 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2006)