From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardline Design LLC v. Edge Int'l, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 21, 2013
CASE NO.: 3:12-cv-04001-RS (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 3:12-cv-04001-RS

03-21-2013

HARDLINE DESIGN LLC, Plaintiff, v. EDGE INTERNATIONAL, LLC; and B8 CONCEPT LTD., Defendants. AND ALL RELATED CROSS CLAIMS

D. Inder Comar COMAR LAW Attorney for Plaintiff / Counterclaim Defendant HARDLINE DESIGN LLC Joshua Kirsch GIBSON ROBB & LINDH LLP Attorney for Defendant / Counterclaim Plaintiff EDGE INTERNATIONAL, LLC


COMAR LAW
D. Inder Comar (SBN 243732)
inder@comarlaw.com
901 Mission Street, Suite 105
San Francisco, CA 94103
Telephone: +1.415.640.5856
Facsimile: +1.415.513.0445
Attorney for Plaintiff
HARDLINE DESIGN LLC

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

WITHOUT PREJUDICE


Judge: The Honorable Richard Seeborg

Trial Date: N/A


Action Filed: July 30, 2012

STIPULATION

Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant HARDLINE DESIGN LLC ("Hardline") and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff EDGE INTERNATIONAL, LLC ("Edge"), hereby submit this joint stipulation and proposed order to dismiss this case without prejudice.

WHEREAS, the parties jointly stipulated to and this Court ordered on November 5, 2012 a 45-day stay;

WHEREAS, the parties jointly stipulated to and this Court ordered on December 18, 2012 a second period of a 45-day stay;

WHEREAS, the parties jointly stipulated to and this Court ordered on January 31, 2013 a third period of a 45-day stay;

WHEREAS, the parties plan to file an arbitration in a manner consistent with the first stipulation granted by the Court, or else settle the case;

THEREFORE Hardline and Edge stipulate that this action shall be dismissed in its entirety, without prejudice, to permit the filing of an arbitration consistent with the first stipulation granted by the Court, or to settle the case.

ORDER


PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

________________________

The Honorable Richard Seeborg

United State District Court Judge

Respectfully submitted,

By ________________________

D. Inder Comar

COMAR LAW

Attorney for Plaintiff / Counterclaim

Defendant

HARDLINE DESIGN LLC

By ________________________

Joshua Kirsch

GIBSON ROBB & LINDH LLP

Attorney for Defendant / Counterclaim

Plaintiff

EDGE INTERNATIONAL, LLC

DECLARATION OF CONSENT

Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1 regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all counsel for all parties.

________________________

D. Inder Comar


Summaries of

Hardline Design LLC v. Edge Int'l, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 21, 2013
CASE NO.: 3:12-cv-04001-RS (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Hardline Design LLC v. Edge Int'l, LLC

Case Details

Full title:HARDLINE DESIGN LLC, Plaintiff, v. EDGE INTERNATIONAL, LLC; and B8 CONCEPT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 21, 2013

Citations

CASE NO.: 3:12-cv-04001-RS (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)