From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardison v. Sheriff

Supreme Court of Nevada
Feb 16, 1977
560 P.2d 148 (Nev. 1977)

Opinion

No. 9470

February 16, 1977

Appeal from order denying pretrial petition for writ of habeas corpus, Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; J. Charles Thompson, J.

Morgan D. Harris, Public Defender, and James O. Porter, Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.

Robert List, Attorney General, Carson City; George E. Holt, District Attorney, and William T. Koot, Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.


OPINION


Pursuant to a True Bill by the Clark County Grand Jury, an indictment was filed charging Willie Hardison with the felonious possession of stolen property, in violation of Nev. Rev. Stat. § 205.275.

A pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus was denied and in this appeal Hardison contends the selection and composition of the grand jury violated his "constitutional rights." He also suggests that the prosecutor failed to present sufficient evidence to establish that Hardison had committed the charged crime.

1. Hardison levels multiple "naked allegations" and numerous "assertions" of improper methods utilized in selecting the grand jurors; however, none are supported by demonstrated facts, a requirement for consideration below, and for appellate review. See Alexander v. Louisiana, 405 U.S. 625 (1972). Cf. Marquez v. State, 91 Nev. 471, 538 P.2d 156 (1975), and cases cited therein.

2. A mere glance at the transcript of the grand jury proceedings clearly establishes that Hardison's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is patently frivolous. Burks v. State, 92 Nev. 670, 557 P.2d 711 (1976). See Franklin v. State, 89 Nev. 382, 513 P.2d 1252 (1973).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hardison v. Sheriff

Supreme Court of Nevada
Feb 16, 1977
560 P.2d 148 (Nev. 1977)
Case details for

Hardison v. Sheriff

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE HARDISON, APPELLANT, v. SHERIFF, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Feb 16, 1977

Citations

560 P.2d 148 (Nev. 1977)
560 P.2d 148

Citing Cases

Phillips v. Sheriff

Additionally, appellant has proffered the contention that the requirements of NRS 172.155(1) were not met and…

Burns v. Sheriff

The allegations are not "supported by demonstrated facts, a requirement for consideration below, and for…