From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harding Park Owners, Inc. v. Young

Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County
Jan 24, 1957
5 Misc. 2d 10 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1957)

Opinion

January 24, 1957

M.S. I.S. Isaacs for plaintiff.

Goldwater Flynn for defendants.


Motion to vacate a notice for examination before trial of defendants is denied. Section 288 of the Civil Practice Act provides for any party to take a deposition "of any other party which is material and necessary". There is no authority for the proposition that the plaintiff may not examine before trial all codefendants if their testimony is material and necessary. Insofar as the specific objections to individual items of the notice are concerned, these are denied. By a recent decision of this court the plaintiff was ordered to serve a bill of particulars now and permitted to serve a supplemental bill on the conclusion of the examination. All of the items are proper as matters raised by the pleadings and necessary to comply with the defendants' demands for particulars. However, as the plaintiff has expressed willingness to first examine the defendants Samuel H. Golding and John A. Dilliard individually and as president of defendant Private Investors Corporation, the examination of these defendants will take place at Special Term, Part I of this court on February 1, 1957, at 11:00 A.M. or at such other time and place as the attorneys for the parties may agree. If it appears that the examination of the other defendants is material and necessary on the completion of this examination, it may be had on appropriate motion. Settle order.


Summaries of

Harding Park Owners, Inc. v. Young

Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County
Jan 24, 1957
5 Misc. 2d 10 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1957)
Case details for

Harding Park Owners, Inc. v. Young

Case Details

Full title:HARDING PARK OWNERS, INC., as Assignee of VINCENT TIERNEY, Assignor…

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County

Date published: Jan 24, 1957

Citations

5 Misc. 2d 10 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1957)
162 N.Y.S.2d 947

Citing Cases

Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co., Inc.

No questions of fact were presented on this appeal. It appears on the face of the complaint that plaintiff…

Rosado v. Valvo

Where each plaintiff has sued in his or her own behalf, but all join together in one action, the defendant is…