From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardin v. Latimer

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 4, 2013
2:10-cv-1133-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2013)

Opinion


KEVIN HOSEA HARDIN, Plaintiff, v. KAREN LATIMER, et al., Defendants. No. 2:10-cv-1133-EFB P United States District Court, E.D. California. December 4, 2013

ORDER

EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He requests a second extension of time to file his pretrial statement in accordance with the court's October 3, 2013 order and a copy of the operative complaint in this action. Defendants oppose the request. ECF No. 48.

Good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of the operative complaint, ECF No. 18, on plaintiff.

2. Plaintiff's second request for an extension of time (ECF No. 47) is granted and he has 30 days from the date this order is served to file his pretrial statement. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b).

3. Absent a showing of substantial cause, the court does not intend to grant additional requests for extensions of time.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Hardin v. Latimer

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Dec 4, 2013
2:10-cv-1133-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Hardin v. Latimer

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN HOSEA HARDIN, Plaintiff, v. KAREN LATIMER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 4, 2013

Citations

2:10-cv-1133-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 4, 2013)