From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardin v. Huggett

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:20-cv-01872-JAM-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01872-JAM-CKD

06-28-2021

DOUGLAS ANTHONY HARDIN, Plaintiff, v. HUGGETT, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 6, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 6, 2021, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Hardin v. Huggett

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 28, 2021
2:20-cv-01872-JAM-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Hardin v. Huggett

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS ANTHONY HARDIN, Plaintiff, v. HUGGETT, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 28, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-01872-JAM-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)