From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardin v. Baughman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 14, 2021
2:17-cv-1340 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021)

Opinion

2:17-cv-1340 MCE AC P

07-14-2021

LEON HARDIN, Plaintiff, v. D. BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLANND, JR., SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 27, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 36. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations, ECF Nos. 42, 44, to which defendants have responded, ECF No. 43.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 27, 2021, ECF No. 36, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiffs requests to withdraw from the settlement agreement and re-open the case, ECF Nos. 34, 37, are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hardin v. Baughman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 14, 2021
2:17-cv-1340 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Hardin v. Baughman

Case Details

Full title:LEON HARDIN, Plaintiff, v. D. BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

Citations

2:17-cv-1340 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 14, 2021)