From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hardin v. Baughman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 22, 2021
2:17-cv-1340 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2021)

Opinion

2:17-cv-1340 MCE AC P

06-22-2021

LEON HARDIN, Plaintiff, v. D. BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion for an extension of time. ECF No. 39. The motion does not identify the deadline plaintiff wishes to extend or how much additional time he seeks. Presumably, he is seeking to extend his deadline to object to the May 27, 2021 findings and recommendations, as there are no other pending deadlines. Good cause appearing, the motion will be granted. Plaintiff is advised that if he seeks any further extensions of time, he should identify the deadline he wants to extend and state how much additional time he would like.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for an extension of time, ECF No. 39, is GRANTED. Within twenty-one days of the service of this order, plaintiff may file objections to the May 27, 2021 findings and recommendations.


Summaries of

Hardin v. Baughman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 22, 2021
2:17-cv-1340 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Hardin v. Baughman

Case Details

Full title:LEON HARDIN, Plaintiff, v. D. BAUGHMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 22, 2021

Citations

2:17-cv-1340 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2021)