Opinion
CASE NO. 19-3154-SAC
09-25-2019
TONY ALLEN HARDESTY, JR., Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW NESLSON, Defendant.
ORDER
Plaintiff filed this pro se civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2.) On August 20, 2019, the Court entered a Notice of Deficiency (Doc. 3) granting Plaintiff until September 19, 2019, to provide the financial information required to support his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 18 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff has not provided the financial information by the deadline.
Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "authorizes a district court, upon a defendant's motion, to order the dismissal of an action for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or 'a court order.'" Young v. U.S., 316 F. App'x 764, 771 (10th Cir. 2009) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)). "This rule has been interpreted as permitting district courts to dismiss actions sua sponte when one of these conditions is met." Id. (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962); Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003)). "In addition, it is well established in this circuit that a district court is not obligated to follow any particular procedures when dismissing an action without prejudice under Rule 41(b)." Young, 316 F. App'x at 771-72 (citations omitted).
Plaintiff has failed to provide the financial information by the deadline. Therefore, this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT this matter is dismissed without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated in Topeka, Kansas, on this 25th day of September, 2019.
s/ Sam A. Crow
Sam A. Crow
U.S. Senior District Judge