From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harden v. Stockard

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1939
200 S.E. 409 (N.C. 1939)

Opinion

(Filed 4 January, 1939.)

APPEAL by plaintiffs from Thompson, J., at June Term, 1938, of ALAMANCE.

John J. Henderson for plaintiffs, appellants.

Huger S. King for defendants Stockard and Fertilizer Works, appellees.


Civil action to restrain sale under execution.

From judgment dissolving the temporary restraining order and dismissing the action, the plaintiffs appeal, assigning errors.


The basis of the judgment is that the rights of all the parties, judgment creditor, mortgagees, and debtors, are to be determined according to what appears upon the public records of Alamance County. In this, there is no error. Armstrong v. Price, 203 N.C. 833, 167 S.E. 77; Bank v. Sauls, 183 N.C. 165, 110 S.E. 865; Callahan v. Flack, 205 N.C. 105, 170 S.E. 125.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Harden v. Stockard

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1939
200 S.E. 409 (N.C. 1939)
Case details for

Harden v. Stockard

Case Details

Full title:GRAHAM HARDEN ET AL. v. H. J. STOCKARD, SHERIFF, ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1939

Citations

200 S.E. 409 (N.C. 1939)
214 N.C. 848

Citing Cases

First Nat'l Bank v. Sauls

Affirmed. Cited: Guano Co. v. Walston, 187 N.C. 673; Trust Co. v. White, 189 N.C. 283; Faircloth v. Johnson,…