From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harden v. Massee

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Apr 10, 2009
NO. 5:08-CV-443 (CAR) (M.D. Ga. Apr. 10, 2009)

Opinion

NO. 5:08-CV-443 (CAR).

April 10, 2009


PROCEEDINGS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ORDER


Petitioner TROY ANTHONY HARDEN has requested this Court to provide legal representation for him in the above-captioned 28 U.S.C. § 2254 proceeding. It appears that at the present time, the essential facts and legal doctrines in this case are ascertainable by the petitioner without the assistance of court-appointed legal counsel and that the existence of exceptional circumstances has not been shown by the petitioner.

The Court on its own motion will consider appointing legal counsel for the petitioner if and when it becomes apparent that legal assistance is required in order to avoid prejudice to his rights. Accordingly, petitioner's motion for appointment of legal counsel is DENIED at this time.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harden v. Massee

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Apr 10, 2009
NO. 5:08-CV-443 (CAR) (M.D. Ga. Apr. 10, 2009)
Case details for

Harden v. Massee

Case Details

Full title:TROY ANTHONY HARDEN, Petitioner v. WILLIAM MASSEE, JR., Sheriff, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division

Date published: Apr 10, 2009

Citations

NO. 5:08-CV-443 (CAR) (M.D. Ga. Apr. 10, 2009)