From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harden v. Hoover

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 2, 2024
1:22-cv-1120 (W.D. Mich. Jul. 2, 2024)

Opinion

1:22-cv-1120

07-02-2024

JUSTIN CARNAZ HARDEN, Plaintiff, v. BARBARA HOOVER and MICHAEL TOMASZCYZK, Defendants.


Hon. Jane M. Beckering J.

ORDER STAYING CASE

RAY KENT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner in the custody of the Michigan Department of Corrections, filed this action as a pro se civil rights lawsuit against defendants Hoover and Tomaszczyk. After defendants moved for summary judgment based on plaintiff's failure to exhaust administrative remedies (ECF No. 21), the Oliver Law Group PC entered an appearance for plaintiff and filed a response to the motion. Based on these developments, the Court concludes that the case should be stayed until the preliminary question of exhaustion is resolved.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this case is STAYED pending further order of the Court. If plaintiff's case survives the pending motion for summary judgment, then the Court will issue an amended case management order.


Summaries of

Harden v. Hoover

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jul 2, 2024
1:22-cv-1120 (W.D. Mich. Jul. 2, 2024)
Case details for

Harden v. Hoover

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN CARNAZ HARDEN, Plaintiff, v. BARBARA HOOVER and MICHAEL TOMASZCYZK…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jul 2, 2024

Citations

1:22-cv-1120 (W.D. Mich. Jul. 2, 2024)