Opinion
No. 05-05-00113-CR
Opinion Filed February 21, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F04-73170-T. Affirmed.
Before Justices RICHTER, LANG, and MAZZANT.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Lonel Hardeman, Jr., appeals his conviction for robbery. Punishment was assessed at thirty years of confinement. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant filed a pro se response claiming there are five arguable issues for appeal. We have reviewed the record, counsel's brief, and appellant's pro se response. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We affirm the trial court's judgment.