Opinion
CV-21-01032-PHX-MTL (ESW)
03-10-2022
Ronnie Hassan Harb, Plaintiff, v. Paul Penzone, Defendant.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
ORDER
Michael T. Liburdi, United States District Judge.
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett's Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 19), recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff Ronnie Hassan Harb's Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. 14). (Doc. 19.) Neither party has filed objections to the R & R, and the time to do so has passed.
In reviewing an R & R, this Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). “[T]he district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise.” United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (emphasis in original); see Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts need not conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”). No. objections having been received, the Court will accept and adopt the R & R.
Based on the foregoing,
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is accepted. The Motion to Amend Complaint (Doc. 14) is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Pleading (Doc. 27) and Motion for Leave to File Second Supplemental Pleading (Doc. 30).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the Motion to Strike (Doc. 38) as moot.