From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harb v. Franchise Tax Board

Court of Appeal of California
May 10, 2007
A109715 (Cal. Ct. App. May. 10, 2007)

Opinion

A109715 A110668

5-10-2007

JOSEPH HARB, TRUSTEE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, Defendant and Respondent.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED


THE COURT:

The petition for rehearing filed by appellants on April 26, 2007, is denied.

The opinion filed herein on April 11, 2007, is ordered modified at page 4 to delete the first sentence in the first paragraph and to substitute therefor the following: "The Markens argue that the trial court erred in determining that the gain they realized from their sale of BICO stock was taxable as wages."

There is no change in the judgment.


Summaries of

Harb v. Franchise Tax Board

Court of Appeal of California
May 10, 2007
A109715 (Cal. Ct. App. May. 10, 2007)
Case details for

Harb v. Franchise Tax Board

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH HARB, TRUSTEE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. FRANCHISE TAX…

Court:Court of Appeal of California

Date published: May 10, 2007

Citations

A109715 (Cal. Ct. App. May. 10, 2007)