From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Harajli v. Naser

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 8, 2007
Case No. 06-10486 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 8, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 06-10486.

February 8, 2007


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


On September 27, 2006, Magistrate Judge Pepe recommended that Defendant Ajami's Rule 12(b)(1) motion be granted and this case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. On January 18, 2007, Magistrate Judge Pepe recommended the Motion for Summary Judgment by the remaining Defendants be granted and the case against them be dismissed without prejudice pending the resolution of state criminal charges against Plaintiff Harajli. The deadline set by Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) for any objections has now passed, and no such objections have been received.

Therefore, I ADOPT the report and recommendation of the magistrate regarding Defendant Ajami's 12(b)(1) motion, and DISMISS the case against him for lack of jurisdiction. I also ADOPT the report and recommendation of the magistrate regarding the Motion for Summary Judgment brought by the remaining Defendants, and DISMISS the claims against these Defendants without prejudice, pending the resolution of the state criminal charges against Plaintiff Harajli. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Harajli v. Naser

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 8, 2007
Case No. 06-10486 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 8, 2007)
Case details for

Harajli v. Naser

Case Details

Full title:HASAN HARAJLI and SUZAN BAYDOUN, Plaintiffs, v. ALI NASER, JANE DOE NASER…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Feb 8, 2007

Citations

Case No. 06-10486 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 8, 2007)