From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hantout v. LaMorte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 6, 1995
221 A.D.2d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 6, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the plaintiffs' Labor Law causes of action insofar as asserted against the defendants Giacomo Minafra, Red Hook Deli, Inc., and Nessel Electric Co. (see, Comes v New York State Elec. Gas Corp., 82 N.Y.2d 876, 877; Russin v Picciano Sons, 54 N.Y.2d 311; Wendel v Pillsbury Corp., 205 A.D.2d 527; D'Amico v New York Racing Assn., 203 A.D.2d 509). Additionally, the court properly dismissed the causes of action asserted against the defendant Vito LaMorte pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1), § 241 (1)-(5), and § 241-a. Sullivan, J.P., Miller, Thompson and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hantout v. LaMorte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 6, 1995
221 A.D.2d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Hantout v. LaMorte

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HANTOUT et al., Appellants, v. VITO LaMORTE et al., Respondents…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 6, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 317 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 476