From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hanson v. Metzger

United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division
Apr 5, 2010
No. CV-10-05-GF-SEH (D. Mont. Apr. 5, 2010)

Opinion

No. CV-10-05-GF-SEH.

April 5, 2010


ORDER


United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered Findings and Recommendations in this matter on February 17, 2010, and on March 11, 2010. Plaintiff filed objections on March 2, 2010, and on March 25, 2010. The Court reviews de novo findings and recommendations to which objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Document No. 11

Document No. 15

Document No. 12

Document No. 16

Upon de novo review of the record, I find no error in Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations and adopt them in full.

ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff Jane Doe is DISMISSED as party in this case.

2. Plaintiff Michael Hanson's federal claims are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

3. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff Hanson's state law claims. 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3).

4. No further amendments of the Complaint will be allowed as they would be futile.

5. Any appeal from this disposition will not be taken in good faith as Plaintiff Hanson's claims are frivolous. Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(3).

6. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.


Summaries of

Hanson v. Metzger

United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division
Apr 5, 2010
No. CV-10-05-GF-SEH (D. Mont. Apr. 5, 2010)
Case details for

Hanson v. Metzger

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL LEE HANSON, Plaintiff, v. LINDA METZGER, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Montana, Great Falls Division

Date published: Apr 5, 2010

Citations

No. CV-10-05-GF-SEH (D. Mont. Apr. 5, 2010)

Citing Cases

Glick v. Molloy

In sum, Glick's conclusory and bare allegations of RICO violations do not rise to the level of any plausible…