From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hanson v. McGraw-Hill Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1925
213 App. Div. 873 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Opinion

April, 1925.

Present — Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox, Kelby and Young, JJ.


Judgment and order reversed on the law, and the verdict of the jury unanimously reinstated, with costs to the appellant. The learned trial justice set aside the verdict in favor of the plaintiff solely on the ground that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. We are of the opinion that the trial justice was correct in the first instance in leaving the question of contributory negligence to the jury as a question of fact. We are in accord with the reasoning in Teich v. Seidman's Garage (188 N.Y. Supp. 488). The cases cited by the learned trial justice all relate to accidents where the plaintiff was struck by a descending elevator after he had wholly or partly entered an elevator shaft.


Summaries of

Hanson v. McGraw-Hill Co., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1925
213 App. Div. 873 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)
Case details for

Hanson v. McGraw-Hill Co., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK W. HANSON, Appellant, v. McGRAW-HILL Co., INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1925

Citations

213 App. Div. 873 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Citing Cases

Zucker v. Ephraim Realty Corporation

The complaint was dismissed at the close of plaintiffs' evidence on the ground that the infant plaintiff was…