From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hanson v. Hogan

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Nov 1, 1908
61 Misc. 95 (N.Y. App. Term 1908)

Opinion

November, 1908.

James B. Henney, for appellants.

Charles Swanson, for respondent.


The plaintiff brings his action under the Employers' Liability Act to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received under the employment of the defendants, while he was working at, and in consequence of a defect in, a winch used in unloading a vessel at pier 39, North river. He so timely notified his employers in writing, but his testimony fails to establish a defect. That the winch reversed while he was pulling in rope over one of its drums, and caused the rope to run the opposite way, whereby the plaintiff went over the winch and struck the hatch comb, may prove the fact of accident and injury, but not the violation of legal obligation on the part of his employers, the defendants. The judgment herein in his favor should, therefore, be reversed, and a new trial ordered.

Present: GILDERSLEEVE, MacLEAN and SEABURY, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.


Summaries of

Hanson v. Hogan

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Nov 1, 1908
61 Misc. 95 (N.Y. App. Term 1908)
Case details for

Hanson v. Hogan

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES HANSON, Respondent, v . CHARLES W. HOGAN and JEFFERSON HOGAN…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Nov 1, 1908

Citations

61 Misc. 95 (N.Y. App. Term 1908)
112 N.Y.S. 1103