ance, the prisoner should be deemed to have exhausted administrative remedies." (citing Andres v. Marshall, 867 F.3d 1076, 1079 (9th Cir. 2017)); Carrillo v. Moore, No. 2:18-cv-00708-SB, 2019 WL 7556264, at *2 (D. Or. Dec. 20, 2019) (concluding that defendants could not establish that the inmate failed to exhaust his administrative remedies when the defendants admittedly failed to maintain a copy of the inmate's grievances); Roe v. Tubbs, No. 2:15-CV-588-JNP, 2018 WL 1406598, at *2 (D. Utah Mar. 19, 2018) (rejecting the defendant's argument that it could "block [the inmate] from exhausting his administrative remedies by simply neglecting to retain copies of the forms submitted to them"); but see Morton v. Hall, 599 F.3d 942, 945-46 (9th Cir. 2010) (concluding that the defendants met the burden for administrative exhaustion by presenting the prison's record keeper who testified that the prison had no record of the inmate's grievance because the inmate never filed any such grievance); Hanslovan v. Blades, No. CV08-100-S-BLW, 2009 WL 1635374, at *3 (D. Idaho June 10, 2009) (holding that even when the prison did not begin maintaining records of grievances until a year after the inmates injury, the inmate failed to allege and provide evidence that he exhausted his administrative remedies). In this case, Green is correct that the prison's tabulation of grievances submitted in support of its summary judgment motion appears to omit the grievance Green filed on September 18, 2017.