From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hansen v. Turley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
Mar 7, 2013
Case No. 1:12-CV-19 CW (D. Utah Mar. 7, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:12-CV-19 CW

03-07-2013

TIMOTHY HANSEN, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN TURLEY et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING MOTION & MEMORANDUM DECISION


District Judge Clark Waddoups

Plaintiff, Timothy Hansen, filed a pro se prisoner civil rights complaint. Plaintiff now moves for appointed counsel.

See 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983 (2012).

Plaintiff has no constitutional right to counsel. However, the Court may in its discretion appoint counsel for indigent inmates. "The burden is upon the applicant to convince the court that there is sufficient merit to his claim to warrant the appointment of counsel."

See Carper v. Deland, 54 F.3d 613, 616 (10th Cir. 1995); Bee v. Utah State Prison, 823 F.2d 397, 399 (10th Cir. 1987).

See 28 U.S.C.S. § 1915(e)(1) (2012); Carper, 54 F.3d at 617; Williams v. Meese, 926 F.2d 994, 996 (10th Cir. 1991).

McCarthy v. Weinberg, 753 F.2d 836, 838 (10th Cir. 1985).

When deciding whether to appoint counsel, the district court should consider a variety of factors, "including 'the merits of the litigant's claims, the nature of the factual issues raised in the claims, the litigant's ability to present his claims, and the complexity of the legal issues raised by the claims.'" Considering the above factors, the Court concludes here that, at this time, Plaintiff's claims may not be colorable, the issues in this case are not complex, and Plaintiff is not at this time too incapacitated or unable to adequately function in pursuing this matter. Thus, the Court denies for now Plaintiff's motions for appointed counsel.

Rucks v. Boergermann, 57 F.3d 978, 979 (10th Cir. 1995) (quoting Williams, 926 F.2d at 996); accord McCarthy, 753 F.2d at 838-39.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motions for appointed counsel are DENIED; however, if, after the case develops further, it appears that counsel may be needed or of specific help, the Court will ask an attorney to appear pro bono on Plaintiff's behalf. The Court will accept no further motions for appointed counsel.

(See Docket Entry #s 5, 10 & 29.)
--------

BY THE COURT:

_______________

JUDGE CLARK WADDOUPS

United States District Court


Summaries of

Hansen v. Turley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
Mar 7, 2013
Case No. 1:12-CV-19 CW (D. Utah Mar. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Hansen v. Turley

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY HANSEN, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN TURLEY et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

Date published: Mar 7, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:12-CV-19 CW (D. Utah Mar. 7, 2013)