From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hansen v. Maine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 1996
223 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

January 29, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs correctly assert that absent fraud, overreaching, mistake, or duress, an open-court stipulation will not be disturbed by a court ( see, Doppelt v Doppelt, 215 A.D.2d 715). However, the trial court enforced the stipulation exactly as it was agreed upon by the parties and did not impermissibly alter or modify the terms thereof.

The plaintiffs' remaining contention, regarding an inquest to determine the amount of damages owed to them, was not raised in the trial court and is not properly before this Court on appeal ( see, Robinson v Donald C. Swanson, Inc., 205 A.D.2d 678). Mangano, P.J., Miller, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hansen v. Maine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 29, 1996
223 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Hansen v. Maine

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD HANSEN et al., Appellants, v. REXFORD MAINE et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 29, 1996

Citations

223 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
637 N.Y.S.2d 193

Citing Cases

Spector v. Spector

The court's order simply enforces the terms of that stipulation requiring performance by both parties. The…