From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hansen v. Hansen

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Apr 26, 2005
161 S.W.3d 904 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

No. ED 84079.

April 26, 2005.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; Gloria Clark Reno, Judge.

Joseph Porzenski, St. Charles, MO, for Appellant.

The Roach Law Firm, Clayton, MO, for respondent.

Before LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J. and LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J. and MARY K. HOFF, J.


ORDER


Gregory S. Hansen (Husband) appeals from the trial court's judgment and decree (judgment) dissolving his marriage to Marcia V. Hansen (Wife). Husband alleges the trial court erred in its award of maintenance, allocation of debt, and award of attorney's fees on appeal.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. The judgment is supported by competent and substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hansen v. Hansen

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Apr 26, 2005
161 S.W.3d 904 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

Hansen v. Hansen

Case Details

Full title:Marcia V. HANSEN, Respondent, v. Gregory S. HANSEN, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Apr 26, 2005

Citations

161 S.W.3d 904 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Kyger v. Koerper

The rule is stated in 17 C.J.S. 259, sec. 94, that "in stating the grounds on which a continuance is asked,…