From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hansen v. Cassagnol

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Feb 5, 2010
No. CIV 09-0424 JB/GBW (D.N.M. Feb. 5, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV 09-0424 JB/GBW.

February 5, 2010

Randolph B. Felker, Felker Ish Ritchie Geer PA, Santa Fe, New Mexico, Attorneys for the Plaintiffs.

Mark T. Pound, Long, Pound Komer, PA, Santa Fe, New Mexico, Attorneys for the Defendant.


ORDER


THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant's Motion for Entry of Default on the Defendant's Counterclaims, filed August 3, 2009 (Doc. 22). The Court held a hearing on February 3, 2010. The primary issue is whether the Court should deny Defendant Caroline Cassagnol's request that the Clerk of the Court enter default on her counterclaims against Plaintiffs Karen Hansen and Christopher Hedrick pursuant to rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Plaintiffs filed their Answer two days after Cassagnol filed the motion. See Plaintiffs' Answer to Defendant's Counterclaims, filed August 5, 2009 (Doc. 24). For the reasons stated on the record and for further reasons stated in the Court's February 4, 2010 Order denying the Defendant's Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 34), the Defendant's motion is denied.

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion for Entry of Default on the Defendant's Counterclaims is denied.


Summaries of

Hansen v. Cassagnol

United States District Court, D. New Mexico
Feb 5, 2010
No. CIV 09-0424 JB/GBW (D.N.M. Feb. 5, 2010)
Case details for

Hansen v. Cassagnol

Case Details

Full title:KAREN HANSEN and CHRISTOPHER W. HEDRICK, Plaintiffs, v. CAROLINE CASSAGNOL…

Court:United States District Court, D. New Mexico

Date published: Feb 5, 2010

Citations

No. CIV 09-0424 JB/GBW (D.N.M. Feb. 5, 2010)