From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hansen v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jul 24, 2012
Civil No. 6:11-CV-6204-TC (D. Or. Jul. 24, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 6:11-CV-6204-TC

07-24-2012

CAROL GENE HANSEN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on June 19, 2012. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co.. Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202,1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist, 708 F.2d 452,454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo. I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation,

_________________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hansen v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jul 24, 2012
Civil No. 6:11-CV-6204-TC (D. Or. Jul. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Hansen v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:CAROL GENE HANSEN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jul 24, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 6:11-CV-6204-TC (D. Or. Jul. 24, 2012)