From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hanrahan v. Hanrahan

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 17, 1993
618 So. 2d 779 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-58.

May 17, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County, L. Haldane Taylor, J.

Alan Rosner of Harris, Guidi, Rosner Dunlap, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellant.

Russell L. Healey of Lacy Mahon, Jr., and Mark H. Mahon, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellee.


This is an appeal by the former husband of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage that equitably distributed the parties' marital assets and liabilities and awarded the former wife rehabilitative alimony for support. Although the overall plan of asset distribution and support fashioned by the trial court appears to be reasonable under the circumstances, we find it necessary to reverse the award of rehabilitative alimony because the evidence and the findings in the appealed judgment are legally insufficient to support a specific plan of rehabilitation. Clance v. Clance, 576 So.2d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). As this reversal of the rehabilitative alimony award will affect the overall scheme of asset distribution and support, we also vacate all provisions in the judgment effecting the distribution of marital assets and remand the case for further proceedings. See Wendroff v. Wendroff, 614 So.2d 590 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). The dissolution of the marriage is not affected by this appeal.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

ZEHMER, BARFIELD and MINER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hanrahan v. Hanrahan

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 17, 1993
618 So. 2d 779 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Hanrahan v. Hanrahan

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL E. HANRAHAN, APPELLANT, v. MARILYN B. HANRAHAN, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 17, 1993

Citations

618 So. 2d 779 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Waggoner v. Waggoner

E.g., Seymour v. Seymour, 661 So.2d 28 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). However, we note that, because it appears that…

Shiveley v. Shiveley

All matters relating to alimony are interrelated, and the court should be empowered to revisit the entire…