From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hanor v. Hinckley

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 28, 1991
584 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 91-1762.

August 28, 1991.

Hugh T. Maloney, Patterson, Maloney Gardiner, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.

Dale R. Sanders, Lyons and Sanders, Chartered, Fort Lauderdale, for wife.


By petition for writ of mandamus George Richard Hanor seeks to require The Honorable Harry G. Hinckley, Jr., Circuit Judge, to hear all matters in this case without referral to a master unless consented to by all of the parties.

It appears that the trial judge referred several aspects of the case, i.e., temporary alimony and attorney's fees, to a master over the objection of Hanor. Reference under those circumstances is prohibited by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490(c). Taylor v. Taylor, 569 So.2d 1389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Murphy v. Murphy, 558 So.2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

Accordingly, the writ shall issue. Pursuant thereto, the trial court shall vacate the order of reference and proceed in conformity with this opinion.

DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hanor v. Hinckley

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 28, 1991
584 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Hanor v. Hinckley

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE RICHARD HANOR, PETITIONER, v. THE HONORABLE HARRY G. HINCKLEY, JR.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 28, 1991

Citations

584 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Urdaneta v. Urdaneta

We reverse, as we have done previously, on the grounds that the trial court may not assign such matters to a…

Prater v. Lehmbeck

Wilson v. McKay, 568 So.2d 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Kuper v. Kuper, 564 So.2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). It is…