From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hannah v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 26, 1928
118 So. 924 (Ala. Crim. App. 1928)

Opinion

7 Div. 459.

June 12, 1928. Rehearing Denied June 26, 1928.

Appeal from Circuit Court, St. Clair County; O. A. Steele, Judge.

Certiorari Denied by Supreme Court in Hannah v. State, 118 So. 921.

Frank B. Embry, of Pell City, for appellant.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The conviction of this appellant was under the first count of the indictment, which charged that he did distill, make, or manufacture alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of which was alcohol. The evidence given by the state's witnesses tended fully to make out the charge in all of its essentials and elements. That for the defendant tended otherwise. This conflict made a jury question, and the jury were justified under the evidence in returning their verdict. The exceptions reserved pending the trial are so manifestly without merit they need no discussion. Judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hannah v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 26, 1928
118 So. 924 (Ala. Crim. App. 1928)
Case details for

Hannah v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ed HANNAH v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 26, 1928

Citations

118 So. 924 (Ala. Crim. App. 1928)
22 Ala. App. 672

Citing Cases

Hannah v. State

GARDNER, J. Petition of Ed Hannah for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment…