Opinion
2:23-cv-00415-RFB-DJA
04-19-2023
MELANIE L. THOMAS Nevada Bar No. 12576 Melanie.Thomas@lewisbrisbois.com LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLPAttorney for Third-Party Defendant Delta Faucet Company Kimberly A. Nelson LARRY H. LUM, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14914 KAREN L. BASHOR, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11913 KIMBERLY A. NELSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15295 Attorneys for Defendant Westgate Las Vegas Resort, LLC
MELANIE L. THOMAS Nevada Bar No. 12576 Melanie.Thomas@lewisbrisbois.com LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLPAttorney for Third-Party Defendant Delta Faucet Company
Kimberly A. Nelson LARRY H. LUM, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14914 KAREN L. BASHOR, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11913 KIMBERLY A. NELSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15295 Attorneys for Defendant Westgate Las Vegas Resort, LLC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT DELTA FAUCET COMPANY TO FILE ANSWER TO DEFENDANT/THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF WESTGATE LAS VEGAS RESORT, LLC'S THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT DELTA FAUCET COMPANY TO FILE ANSWER TO DEFENDANT/THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF WESTGATE LAS VEGAS RESORT, LLC'S THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)
DANIEL J. ALBREGTS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff Westgate Las Vegas Resort, LLC and Third-Party Defendant Delta Faucet, by and through their respective counsel of record, that the deadline for Third-Party Defendant Delta Faucet Company to file its Answer to Defendant Westgate Las Vegas Resort, LLC's Third-Party Complaint will be extended seven (7) days from April 18, 2023 to April 25, 2023.
Westgate Las Vegas Resort, LLC's Third-Party Complaint against Delta Faucet Company was filed on March 24, 2023 (ECF No. 08). This is these Parties' first request to extend time. This Stipulation and [Proposed] Order is submitted in accordance LR IA 6-1.
These Parties respectfully request this brief extension of time because counsel for he Third Party Defendant was recently retained, and requires additional time to confer with heir client in order to file an Answer. These Parties' requested extension is not made in bad faith or to unnecessarily delay these proceedings. Therefore, these Parties respectfully request the Court approve the foregoing stipulation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.