Opinion
2:24-cv-00546-FLA (BFMx)
06-24-2024
BISHOY HANNA, Plaintiff, v. JOSH FREEMAN STINN, et al., Defendants.
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ORDER
On January 22, 2024, Plaintiff Bishoy Hanna (“Plaintiff” or “Hanna”) in pro se filed the Complaint in this action, asserting three causes of action against Defendants the Honorable Josh Freeman Stinn (“Judge Stinn”), Crystal Boultinghouse (“Boultinghouse”), and Sarah Gianella (“Giannella”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Dkt. 1. On March 18, 2024, Plaintiff filed the operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), asserting five causes of action for: (1) conspiracy; (2) violation of due process; (3) violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962; (4) malicious prosecution; and (5) discrimination in violation of the equal protection clause. Dkt. 25 (“FAC”).
Plaintiff dismissed Defendants Giannella, Boultinghouse, and Judge Stinn from this action on June 13, 19, and 20, 2024, respectively, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a). Dkts. 55, 57, 58. As Plaintiff has dismissed all Defendants from this action, the court DISMISSES the action in its entirety, without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1). Judge Stinn's Motion to Dismiss the FAC (Dkt. 28) is DENIED without prejudice as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.