Summary
In Hanna, for example, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court analyzed a provision that allowed the insurer to cancel the policy by "mailing" written notice.
Summary of this case from Wetty v. AXA Equitable Life Ins. Co.Opinion
November 22, 1960.
January 4, 1961.
Before JONES, C. J. MUSMANNO JONES, COHEN, BOK and EAGEN, JJ.
Appeal, No. 321, Jan. T., 1960, from judgment of Court of Common Pleas No. 7 of Philadelphia County, Sept. T., 1958, No. 1087, in case of Elmer Hanna v. Reliance Insurance Company, successor to Eureka Casualty Company. Judgment affirmed.
Petition for declaratory judgment. Before BROWN, JR., P. J., and a jury.
Verdict entered for plaintiff, defendant's motions for judgment non obstante veredicto and for new trial refused and judgment entered on the verdict. Defendant appealed.
Philip E. Berens, for appellant.
Daniel J. Ryan, with him LaBrum and Doak, for appellee.
The declaratory judgment for the plaintiff entered by the court below is affirmed at appellant's costs.