From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hanlon v. Hannah

Supreme Court of Montana
May 10, 1950
123 Mont. 615 (Mont. 1950)

Opinion

No. 8894.

Decided May 10, 1950.

Appeal from Tenth Judicial District Court, Petroleum County; Stewart McConochie, Judge.

Mr. E.J. McCabe, Great Falls, for Appellant.

Mr. Louis P. Donovan, Shelby and Mr. H. Leonard DeKalb, Lewistown, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

Mr. Ralph J. Anderson, Helena, for Defendant and Respondent.


December 27, 1948, appellants, Stuart W. Hannah, Gustave E. Lindholm, and Mary C. Lindholm, filed notice of appeal from a judgment made and entered against them June 26, 1948, in the District Court of the Tenth Judicial District of the State of Montana, in and for the County of Petroleum.

January 30, 1950, appellants caused to be filed in this court transcript on appeal herein.

April 10, 1950, appellants filed in the office of the clerk of this court their printed brief on appeal, on page 6 whereof they state, "the said judgment should be affirmed," and the concluding sentence of said brief reading, "Therefore, the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed by this court."

April 17, 1950, respondents filed in this court a motion for affirmance of the judgment of the trial court under the provisions of Rule XI of this court and also calling attention to the foregoing statements in appellants' brief and to the fact that appellants therein admit that they are not aggrieved by such judgment.

It is therefore ordered that respondents' motion be granted, that the judgment of the district court be affirmed, and that the appeal be and it is dismissed.


Summaries of

Hanlon v. Hannah

Supreme Court of Montana
May 10, 1950
123 Mont. 615 (Mont. 1950)
Case details for

Hanlon v. Hannah

Case Details

Full title:WM. M. HANLON and ARRO OIL REFINING COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS AND RESPONDENTS…

Court:Supreme Court of Montana

Date published: May 10, 1950

Citations

123 Mont. 615 (Mont. 1950)