From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hanlin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Apr 17, 2003
104 S.W.3d 744 (Ark. 2003)

Opinion

CR 03-344

Opinion delivered April 17, 2003

MOTIONS — RULE ON CLERK — GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING. — An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the clerk.

Motion for Rule on the Clerk; granted.

The Lisk Firm, by: Lynn D. Lisk, for appellant.

No response.


Appellant, Paul Eugene Hanlin, by and through his attorney, Lynn Lisk, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Lynn Lisk, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

[1] We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) ( per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.


Summaries of

Hanlin v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Apr 17, 2003
104 S.W.3d 744 (Ark. 2003)
Case details for

Hanlin v. State

Case Details

Full title:Paul Eugene HANLIN v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Apr 17, 2003

Citations

104 S.W.3d 744 (Ark. 2003)
104 S.W.3d 744