From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hankston v. State

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Oct 10, 2018
NO. PD-0887-15 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 10, 2018)

Opinion

NO. PD-0887-15

10-10-2018

GAREIC JERARD HANKSTON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS


ON APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT HARRIS COUNTY

ORDER

Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to confinement for twenty years. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Hankston v. State, No. 14-13-00923-CR (Tex.App. - Houston [14], delivered June 16, 2015). We granted review and decided that the warrantless acquisition of Appellant's cell phone records did not violate Article I, Section 9 of the Texas Constitution. Hankston v. State, 517 S.W.3d 112 (2017). We held that Appellant's rights pertaining to call logs and cell site location information possessed by a third party are the same under both the Fourth Amendment and under Art. I, § 9.

The Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated this Court's judgment and remanded this case "for further consideration in light of Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.S. ___(2018)."

We now order briefing pursuant to that remand. We order the parties to file their respective briefs in this Court within 30 days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 10 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018. Do not publish


Summaries of

Hankston v. State

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Oct 10, 2018
NO. PD-0887-15 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 10, 2018)
Case details for

Hankston v. State

Case Details

Full title:GAREIC JERARD HANKSTON, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Oct 10, 2018

Citations

NO. PD-0887-15 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 10, 2018)

Citing Cases

Holder v. State

And, if the court of appeals determines that the seizure of the historical cell site location information in…