From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hankin v. JDS Uniphase Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 7, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-3149 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 7, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-3149

11-07-2012

MARK HANKIN and HANMAR ASSOCIATES, MLP, Plaintiffs, v. JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION, Defendant.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of November, 2012, upon consideration of the Plaintiffs' Petition to Partially Confirm and Partially Vacate the Arbitration Award (Docket No. 1), the Defendant's Cross-Motion to Confirm the Arbitration Award (Docket No. 7), the Plaintiffs' Opposition thereto (Docket No. 13), the Defendant's Reply in support thereof (Docket No. 15), and the contentions and arguments of the parties presented at oral argument, it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion (Docket No. 7) is GRANTED and the Plaintiffs' Petition (Docket No. 1) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Clerk of Court shall mark the action as closed.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

GENE E.K. PRATTER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hankin v. JDS Uniphase Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 7, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-3149 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Hankin v. JDS Uniphase Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MARK HANKIN and HANMAR ASSOCIATES, MLP, Plaintiffs, v. JDS UNIPHASE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 7, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-3149 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 7, 2012)