From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haniford v. Safer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 18, 1925
214 App. Div. 435 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Summary

In Haniford v. Safer (supra) there were two actions; by the infant plaintiff for personal injuries, and by the infant's guardian for loss of services and medical expenses.

Summary of this case from Boswell v. Greenberg

Opinion

November 18, 1925.

Appeal from Supreme Court of Erie County.

Henry W. Willis, for the appellant.

Ralph W. Nolan, for the respondents.


These actions were brought in the Supreme Court, Erie county, for damages growing out of an automobile accident. One action was by an infant for personal injuries and the other was brought by his father for loss of services and medical expenses.

The infant was a passenger in the automobile of the defendant Safer, which collided with the car of defendant McCombs and the boy was injured. The cases were tried together and resulted in verdicts against the defendant Safer, the one in favor of the infant being for $100 and the one in favor of the father for $75. But in both actions verdicts were rendered in favor of the defendant McCombs.

She thereupon entered judgments dismissing the complaints as to her, with sixty-one dollars and ninety-seven cents costs in each case. On motion of plaintiffs the Special Term vacated these judgments for costs and the defendant McCombs appeals.

Plaintiffs were not entitled to costs as against the defendant Safer, for the actions could have been brought in the City Court of Buffalo and recoveries against Safer in each case being less than $250, costs could not be taxed against the said defendant. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1474, subd. 7.) The provisions of section 1476 of the Civil Practice Act are inapplicable.

Plaintiffs were not entitled to costs against the defendant McCombs for there was no recovery against her in either case, the verdicts being in her favor. Therefore, the first clause of section 1475 of the Civil Practice Act applies and is controlling and defendant McCombs is entitled to costs and the judgments she entered therefor were proper.

The orders should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements in each case, and motions denied, with ten dollars costs, and the judgments for costs reinstated.

All concur. Present — HUBBS, P.J., CLARK, SEARS, CROUCH and TAYLOR, JJ.

In each case order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, judgment reinstated and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Haniford v. Safer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 18, 1925
214 App. Div. 435 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

In Haniford v. Safer (supra) there were two actions; by the infant plaintiff for personal injuries, and by the infant's guardian for loss of services and medical expenses.

Summary of this case from Boswell v. Greenberg
Case details for

Haniford v. Safer

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT HANIFORD, an Infant, by His Guardian ad Litem, MORRIS HANIFORD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 18, 1925

Citations

214 App. Div. 435 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)
212 N.Y.S. 462

Citing Cases

Hannon v. Epstein

Here the moving defendant is not in that position. He is the successful defendant, and clearly comes within…

Sullivan v. Wager

On the facts presented the denial of the motion for a separate bill of costs in the action brought by the…