From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hanieph v. Marberry

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 22, 2010
Civil Action No. 07-231 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 22, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-231 Erie.

March 22, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This habeas corpus action was received by the Clerk of Court on August 30, 2007 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 15], filed on March 2, 2010, recommended that Petitioner's Petition be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The parties were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file objections. Service was made on Petitioner by certified mail and on Respondent. Petitioner filed objections on March 18, 2010 [Doc. No. 16]. After de novo review of the petition and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2010;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 15] of Magistrate Judge Baxter, filed on March 2, 2010, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.


Summaries of

Hanieph v. Marberry

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 22, 2010
Civil Action No. 07-231 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Hanieph v. Marberry

Case Details

Full title:KURT SHAWN HANIEPH, Petitioner, v. HELEN J. MARBERRY, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 22, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-231 Erie (W.D. Pa. Mar. 22, 2010)