Opinion
2:11-cv-1799-LRH-RJJ
11-28-2012
ORDER
Before the court is pro se plaintiff Hanh Nguyen's ("Nguyen") motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Doc. #18.
Refers to the court's docket number.
I. Facts and Procedural History
In September, 2007, Nguyen purchased real property through a mortgage note and deed of trust originated by defendants. Eventually, Nguyen defaulted on the mortgage note and defendants initiated non-judicial foreclosure proceedings.
Subsequently, Nguyen filed a complaint against defendants for wrongful foreclosure. Doc. #1, Exhibit A. Thereafter, Nguyen filed the present motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Doc. #18.
II. Discussion
A party may amend its pleadings after a responsive pleading has been filed by leave of court. FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a)(2). Leave of court to amend should be freely given when justice so requires and when there is no undue delay, bad faith, or dilatory motive on the part of the moving party. See Wright v. Incline Village General Imp. Dist., 597 F.Supp.2d 1191 (D. Nev. 2009); DCD Programs, LTD v. Leighton, 883 F.2d 183 (9th Cir. 1987).
Here, Nguyen requests leave to amend his complaint to add additional claims and allegations against the named defendants. See Doc. #18. A copy of the proposed amended complaint is attached to the motion in accordance with LR 15-1. Doc. #18, Exhibit 1.
The court finds that there is no undue delay, bad faith, or dilatory motive on behalf of Nguyen in requesting leave to amend his complaint. Further, the court finds that the matter is early in litigation and that defendants would not be prejudiced by allowing amendment. Accordingly, Nguyen shall be granted leave to amend his complaint.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to amend (Doc. #18) is GRANTED. Plaintiff Hanh Nguyen shall have ten (10) days from entry of this order to file the amended complaint attached as Exhibit 1 to the motion to amend (Doc. #18).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (Doc. #16) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE