From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hangartner v. Intel Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Nov 20, 2014
No. 3:14-cv-00141-MO (D. Or. Nov. 20, 2014)

Opinion

No. 3:14-cv-00141-MO

11-20-2014

RICKY D. HANGARTNER, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

,

On November 17, 2014, I held a claim construction hearing in the above-entitled patent action. At issue are claim terms appearing in U.S. Patent Number 6,463,422 ("422 patent"). In this Order, I announce my constructions of the following terms. An explanatory opinion will follow.

Claim Term

Construction

equalizing charge on the gates of the transistor inverter circuits

No construction

cause the cross-coupled pair to randomly assume one of two stable states

No construction

proposed solution to a computing problem

No construction

conjunctive normal form

"described as a series of one or more clauses, each clause made up of one or more literals (variables or their complements)"

one nondeterministic logic element for generating a

No construction



respective random boolean value for each one of the said one or more variables

unstable equilibrium

"a condition where the inputs and outputs of a cross-coupled pair of inverters are in substantially the same state and are substantially unchanging and a small disturbance would produce a change away from that state"

while power is removed from the cross-coupled pair, thereby driving the cross-coupled pair to an unstable equilibrium, whereby ... the cross-coupled pair [] randomly assume[s] one of two stable states when power is restored to the cross-coupled pair

"the cross-coupled pair of inverters is driven to an unstable equilibrium while power is removed from the pair; when power is restored, the pair transitions from the existing unstable equilibrium state to a randomly assumed stable state"

common synchronization means coupled to all of the nondeterministic logic elements for synchronizing operation of the nondeterministic logic elements

"Function: synchronizing operation of the nondeterministic logic elements

Corresponding structure: signal 32, and delay element 64"

coupled to all of the nondeterministic logic elements

"coupled to all of the multiple nondeterministic logic elements"


IT IS SO ORDERD.

DATED this 20th day of November, 2014.

/s/ Michael W. Mosman

MICHAEL W. MOSMAN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hangartner v. Intel Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Nov 20, 2014
No. 3:14-cv-00141-MO (D. Or. Nov. 20, 2014)
Case details for

Hangartner v. Intel Corp.

Case Details

Full title:RICKY D. HANGARTNER, Plaintiff, v. INTEL CORPORATION, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Nov 20, 2014

Citations

No. 3:14-cv-00141-MO (D. Or. Nov. 20, 2014)