From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hanford v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2013
NO. ED CV 12-2211-DMG(E) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)

Opinion

NO. ED CV 12-2211-DMG(E)

02-21-2013

DERRICK L. HANFORD, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

By Order filed January 3, 2013, the Court directed Plaintiff to file a proof of service of the Summons and Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of that Order. As of the present date, no such proof of service has been filed.

IT IS ORDERED that, within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall file a declaration attempting to show cause, if there be any, why this action should not be dismissed for violation of this Court's previous Order and for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute this action. See Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30 (1952). Failure timely to do so may be deemed consent to the dismissal of this action.

____________

CHARLES F. EICK

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hanford v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 21, 2013
NO. ED CV 12-2211-DMG(E) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Hanford v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK L. HANFORD, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 21, 2013

Citations

NO. ED CV 12-2211-DMG(E) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)