From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hanfgarn v. Mark

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 25, 1937
274 N.Y. 570 (N.Y. 1937)

Opinion

Submitted May 17, 1937

Decided May 25, 1937


Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto the following:

"A question under the Federal Constitution was presented and necessarily passed upon by this court. The plaintiff contended that Sections 61-a, 61-i, of the Civil Practice Act of the State of New York (Chapter 263 of the Laws of 1935), in so far as they abolish the right of action to recover damages in an action for alienation of affections and criminal conversation, are repugnant to, and violative of, the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. This court held that such laws are not repugnant to, or violative of, the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States." (See 274 N.Y. 22.)


Summaries of

Hanfgarn v. Mark

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 25, 1937
274 N.Y. 570 (N.Y. 1937)
Case details for

Hanfgarn v. Mark

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE HANFGARN, Respondent, v. GEORGE MARK, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 25, 1937

Citations

274 N.Y. 570 (N.Y. 1937)

Citing Cases

Bernay v. Sales

In the instant case, appellant has set forth persuasive showings of improper service of process, lack of…