From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Haney v. Nangalama

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 28, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1218-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-11-1218-MCE-CMK-P

10-28-2011

MONTE L. HANEY, Plaintiff, v. A. NANGALAMA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 5, 2011, the court issued an order setting a schedule for this litigation. In that order, the parties were informed that discovery requests are to be served on the opposing party, but not filed with the court unless required by the local rules. However, plaintiff has submitted to the court several discovery requests to be filed. These documents are not properly filed with the court, as plaintiff was previously informed. The court will therefore disregard each of these discovery requests. Plaintiff is cautioned not to file unnecessary documents with the court in the future.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the discovery requests filed by the plaintiff (Docs. 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22) are disregarded.

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Haney v. Nangalama

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 28, 2011
No. CIV S-11-1218-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Haney v. Nangalama

Case Details

Full title:MONTE L. HANEY, Plaintiff, v. A. NANGALAMA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 28, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-11-1218-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 28, 2011)