Opinion
September, 1933.
Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.
Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. An ex parte order is not appealable. ( Kogan v. Fair Waist Dress Co., Inc., 233 App. Div. 735.)
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Haner v. Buren
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Summaries of
Haner v. Buren
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1933
240 App. Div. 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for
Haner v. Buren
Case Details
Full title:DORA O. HANER, Appellant, v. NORMAN P. VAN BUREN, Respondent
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Sep 1, 1933
Citations
240 App. Div. 800 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Citing Cases
Matter of Scotti
We shall first consider the two appeals. Admittedly, the orders were made ex parte. No appeal lies from an ex…
James v. PowellThe first is from an ex parte order dated November 28, 1966. Such orders are not appealable (CPLR 5701, subd.…