From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Handy v. Diggins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 14, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02022-WYD-KMT (D. Colo. Sep. 14, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02022-WYD-KMT

09-14-2011

WYATT T. HANDY JR., Plaintiff, v. CHIEF DIGGINS, MAJOR v. CONNORS, and CHAPLAIN SCOTT, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge

Date: September 12, 2012

FTR - Courtroom C-201

Deputy Clerk, Nick Richards

Pro Se (by phone)

Thomas G. Bigler

Christopher Wayne Alber

COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER

MOTION HEARING

Court in session: 10:38 a.m.

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Christopher Wayne Alber appears on behalf of the Interested Party, The Colorado Department of Corrections.

Motion Hearing is called on the Interested Party's Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces

Tecum [Doc. No. 98, filed July 21, 2011], Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Take

Depositions Upon Written Questions of Sterritt Fuller or in the Alternative a Court Order

Directing Sterritt Fuller to Answer the Written Questions in a Affidavit Under Penalty or

Perjury [Doc. No. 105, filed July 25, 2011], and Plaintiff's Motion for Order Compelling

Disclosures or Discovery for Failure to Disclose or Cooperate in Discovery [Doc. No.

114, filed July 29, 2011].

Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 93, filed July 20,

2011] will not be heard at this hearing.

Oral argument from Mr. Alber.

Oral argument from Mr. Handy.

It is ORDERED:

Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum [98] is GRANTED IN
PART. The subpoenaed party, The Colorado Department of
Corrections, shall disclose the documents as limited by the court
and discussed on the record to both plaintiff and defense counsel on or before October 3, 2011. The Colorado Department of Corrections will reserve the right to object or file any Motion to Quash Documents once the responsive documents have been identified.

Discussion of Motion for Leave to Take Written Deposition [105].

It is ORDERED: Motion for Leave to Take Written Deposition [105] is DENIED

without prejudice for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 31.

Oral argument from Mr. Handy.

Oral argument from Mr. Bigler.

It is ORDERED: Motion for Order Compelling Disclosures [114] is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT.

The Motion is Denied as to Requests for Production Nos. 4, 5, and 6, however the court will hear further argument on the remaining discovery issues at the continuation hearing on September 16, 2011 at 1:00 p.m.

Court in Recess: 11:50 a.m.

Hearing to be continued.

Total In-Court Time 01:12

*To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.


Summaries of

Handy v. Diggins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Sep 14, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-cv-02022-WYD-KMT (D. Colo. Sep. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Handy v. Diggins

Case Details

Full title:WYATT T. HANDY JR., Plaintiff, v. CHIEF DIGGINS, MAJOR v. CONNORS, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Sep 14, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-02022-WYD-KMT (D. Colo. Sep. 14, 2011)