From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Handy v. City of Sheridan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 8, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01015-WYD-KMT (D. Colo. May. 8, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01015-WYD-KMT

05-08-2012

WYATT T. HANDY, JR., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SHERIDAN, DET. KRISTINE BRYANT, Individual & Official, and OFF. MIKE MONTOYA, Individual & Official, Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

Plaintiff's "Motion for Subpoena" (Doc. No. 13, filed May 8, 2012) is DENIED. It appears that Plaintiff seeks to conduct discovery by serving subpoenas on Defendants or other non-parties. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B)(iv), pro se actions brought by individuals in the custody of the United States, a state, or a state subdivision are a category of proceedings "exempt from initial disclosure." Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B)(iv). Additionally, the local rules of this court provide that a scheduling order and orders for discovery are unnecessary in categories of proceedings listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B). D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2.B.2. The court declines to allow discovery prior to the entry of a scheduling order or discovery order. A preliminary scheduling conference will be set after Defendants have answered or otherwise responded to Plaintiff's Complaint.


Summaries of

Handy v. City of Sheridan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 8, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01015-WYD-KMT (D. Colo. May. 8, 2012)
Case details for

Handy v. City of Sheridan

Case Details

Full title:WYATT T. HANDY, JR., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SHERIDAN, DET. KRISTINE BRYANT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 8, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01015-WYD-KMT (D. Colo. May. 8, 2012)