From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Handte v. Miller

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 21, 2010
3:10-CV-00111-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Sep. 21, 2010)

Opinion

3:10-CV-00111-LRH-RAM.

September 21, 2010


ORDER


Before the court is Defendants James G. Miller, Storey County and Gerald Antinoro's (collectively "Defendants") Motion to Dismiss (#9). Plaintiff Stewart Handte has filed an opposition (#10), and Defendants have filed a reply (#13).

In their reply, Defendants assert for the first time that Plaintiff's third claim for relief under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, and Plaintiff's fourth claim for relief for defamation under Nevada law, should be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See Docket #13, pp. 12-13, 16-17.

To afford Plaintiff the opportunity to be heard on these issues, Plaintiff is directed to file within ten (10) days a sur-reply addressing why the third and fourth claims for relief should not be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Handte v. Miller

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Sep 21, 2010
3:10-CV-00111-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Sep. 21, 2010)
Case details for

Handte v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:STEWART HANDTE, Plaintiff, v. JAMES G. MILLER, an individual; STOREY…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Sep 21, 2010

Citations

3:10-CV-00111-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Sep. 21, 2010)